This publication uses cookies

We use functional and analytical cookies to improve our website. In addition, third parties place tracking cookies to display personalised advertisements on social media. By clicking accept you consent to the placement of these cookies.
icon A

EDCTP portfolio: Senior Fellowships

watermark

Dr Alexander Debrah is evaluating a novel approach to mass drug administration that could accelerate elimination of important neglected infectious diseases.

Combating parasitic worm infections

watermark

Parasitic worm infections such as onchocerciasis (the cause of river blindness) and lymphatic filariasis (responsible for elephantiasis) affect some 200 million people and have major health, social and economic impacts.

The availability of safe and effective treatments and use of mass drug administration programmes have led to great progress in disease control and the prospect of disease elimination. However, current drug treatments have drawbacks: they do not kill adult worms effectively, which can continue to produce microfilariae that can be transmitted to others, and they cannot be used in areas where people may also be infected with another parasitic worm, Loa loa, since death of L. loa parasites can trigger a potentially deadly inflammatory response in the brain.

The challenge

watermark

In his Senior Fellowship, Dr Alexander Debrah is testing a new mass drug administration that overcomes these challenges and could provide an alternative or complementary strategy for disease elimination.

His project takes advantage of the fact that the parasitic worms responsible for onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis are dependent on a commensal bacterium known as Wolbachia, but L. loa is not. Laboratory studies have shown that existing drugs can kill Wolbachia. These include doxycycline, although it is relatively slow-acting, and rifampicin, a mainstay of TB treatment.

In practice, however, rifampicin is less potent than laboratory studies suggest, because of the way that the drug is metabolised in the body. This has encouraged testing of high-dose rifampicin, which has been found to be safe in TB trials. Furthermore, pre-clinical studies have revealed a synergistic interaction between rifampicin and albendazole, one of the drugs currently used in mass drug administration programmes, so shorter treatment regimes could be possible.

The core of Dr Debrah’s project will be two phase II trials comparing the efficacy of high-dose rifampicin and albendazole (for 7 days or 14 days) and 28 days of doxycycline or ivermectin (another commonly used drug in mass drug administration programmes). One trial will focus on onchocerciasis and the second on lymphatic filariasis.

The project

watermark

Dr Debrah’s research will provide important data on an innovative new approach for control of parasitic worm infections, based on currently available drug treatments. It would have the potential to provide an alternative strategy for mass drug administration, particularly important for the 20% of geographic areas where the presence of Loa loa restricts use of existing drugs and for locations where resistance to existing treatments is beginning to emerge.

Impact

icon A
icon B


test the safety and efficacy of this new formulation in young children

Bringing antiretroviral drugs to children

watermark

The CHAPAS trials have ensured that many more children with HIV have benefited
from life-saving antiretrovirals.

EDCTP portfolio: HIV & HIV-associated infections

The challenge

Parasitic worm infections such as onchocerciasis (the cause of river blindness) and lymphatic filariasis (responsible for elephantiasis) affect some 200 million people and have major health, social and economic impacts.

The availability of safe and effective treatments and use of mass drug administration programmes have led to great progress in disease control and the prospect of disease elimination. However, current drug treatments have drawbacks: they do not kill adult worms effectively, which can continue to produce microfilariae that can be transmitted to others, and they cannot be used in areas where people may also be infected with another parasitic worm, Loa loa, since death of L. loa parasites can trigger a potentially deadly inflammatory response in the brain.

watermark

In his Senior Fellowship, Dr Alexander Debrah is testing a new mass drug administration that overcomes these challenges and could provide an alternative or complementary strategy for disease elimination.

His project takes advantage of the fact that the parasitic worms responsible for onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis are dependent on a commensal bacterium known as Wolbachia, but L. loa is not. Laboratory studies have shown that existing drugs can kill Wolbachia. These include doxycycline, although it is relatively slow-acting, and rifampicin, a mainstay of TB treatment.

In practice, however, rifampicin is less potent than laboratory studies suggest, because of the way that the drug is metabolised in the body. This has encouraged testing of high-dose rifampicin, which has been found to be safe in TB trials. Furthermore, pre-clinical studies have revealed a synergistic interaction between rifampicin and albendazole, one of the drugs currently used in mass drug administration programmes, so shorter treatment regimes could be possible.

The core of Dr Debrah’s project will be two phase II trials comparing the efficacy of high-dose rifampicin and albendazole (for 7 days or 14 days) and 28 days of doxycycline or ivermectin (another commonly used drug in mass drug administration programmes). One trial will focus on onchocerciasis and the second on lymphatic filariasis.

The project

The later CHAPAS-3 trial compared the efficacy and safety of three fixed-dose combinations including two without stavudine (found to have some long-term side effects in adults, leading to a recommendation that its use be discontinued in children). The trial the first of its kind in Africa studied nearly 500 children at four sites in two African countries.

Dr Debrah’s research will provide important data on an innovative new approach for control of parasitic worm infections, based on currently available drug treatments. It would have the potential to provide an alternative strategy for mass drug administration, particularly important for the 20% of geographic areas where the presence of Loa loa restricts use of existing drugs and for locations where resistance to existing treatments is beginning to emerge.

ratios forfixed-dose combinations and on appropriatedosage according to weight. 

The CHAPAS-3 trial confirmed the effectiveness of fixed-dose combinations, providing further impetus to the rollout of antiretrovirals to children. Its evidence on abacavir informed the WHO recommendation of abacavir-containing combinations for first-line therapy in children. Trial data have also been used to support applications for regulatory approval for new scored efavirenz tablets.

Impact

L’homme RF et al. Nevirapine, stavudine and lamivudine pharmacokinetics in African children on paediatric fixed-dose combination tablets. AIDS. 2008;22(5):557–65.

Mulenga V et al. Abacavir, zidovudine, or stavudine as paediatric tablets for African HIVinfected children (CHAPAS-3): an open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(2):169–79.

WHO. Guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection: recommendations for a public health approach. 2010.

WHO. Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs
for treating and preventing

HIV infection: Recommendations for a public health approach
(second edition). 2016

Projects: Children with HIV in Africa Pharmacokinetics and Adherence of Simple Antiretroviral Regimens (CHAPAS): CHAPAS-1 and -3

Project lead: Professor Chifumbe Chintu, University Teaching Hospital, Zambia (CHAPAS-1); Dr Veronica Mulenga, University Teaching Hospital, Zambia (CHAPAS-3)

Target population(s): Children with HIV

Sample size: 71 (CHAPAS-1); 480 (CHAPAS-3)

Countries involved: Ireland, the Netherlands, the UK, the USA, Zambia (CHAPAS-1); Uganda, Zambia (CHAPAS-3)

Project duration: 2005–2009 (CHAPAS-1); 2010 –2011 (CHAPAS-3)

EDCTP funding: €1.2M (CHAPAS-1); €4.6M (CHAPAS-3)

Total project funding: €1.2M (CHAPAS-1); €5.0M